PriceDNA Research · County downturns

Home prices hit bottom. Rent held up.

We followed home prices and rents through each US county's hardest housing downturn on record. Prices fell, and for 9 in 10 Americans, rent ended higher.

PriceDNA · Published October 14, 2026 · 3,112 counties · Sources: FHFA House Price Index, HUD Fair Market Rents, BLS Consumer Price Index, US Census Bureau

"Typical" counts people, not counties; what typical means shows why. Figures are in dollars unless they say after inflation.

In short

Home prices fell and took years to come back, while rent ended higher for most Americans. After inflation, home prices lost 30% while rent roughly held its value. In dollars, rent grew more slowly during the downturn than in a county's other years, 2.7% a year against 3.6%, but most of that gap is lower inflation in those years: after inflation, it grew 0.6% a year against 0.7%. In dollars, rent ended lower for 5% of Americans with a rent figure. After inflation it fell more than 5% for 21%, and more than 10% for 7%.

In dollars or after inflation?

We lead with dollars because homes are bought and loans are paid in dollars: a fixed-rate mortgage payment stays the same, so a rent in dollars is what it is weighed against. After inflation shows how those changes compared with everyday costs.

Example: Clark County, Nevada, 2006 to 2011. In dollars, home prices fell 60.2% and rent rose 23.9%. Prices in general rose 11.6% over those years, so to take inflation out, divide by 1.116. Rent: a 23.9% rise means rent ended at 1.239 times where it started. 1.239 ÷ 1.116 = 1.110, so 1.110 − 1 = 0.110: a rise of 11.0% after inflation.

Home prices: a 60.2% fall leaves 0.398 of the starting price. 0.398 ÷ 1.116 = 0.357, so 1 − 0.357 = 0.643: a fall of 64.3% after inflation.

How far prices fell in each county's hardest downturn

Most counties fell between 5% and 20% (1,831 of 3,112). About one in ten fell 30% or more (324 counties), most of them in the 2006 to 2012 housing crisis. The chart counts each county once, in dollars.

The numbers behind this chart
Counties by how far home prices fell from the start of their hardest downturn to its bottom
Price fallCounties
Under 5%415
5 to 10%742
10 to 15%682
15 to 20%407
20 to 30%542
30 to 40%194
40% or more130

The ten deepest falls

These are the extremes, not a sample. All ten are in California, Florida or Nevada. Every one has since recovered, and rent ended higher in every one.

Counties with the largest fall in home prices during their hardest downturn, in dollars
CountyDownturnPrices fellRent changeRecovered
Merced County, CA2006 to 2011−64.3%+29.0%2022
Lyon County, NV2006 to 2012−60.8%+5.7%2019
Stanislaus County, CA2006 to 2011−60.4%+23.3%2021
Clark County (Henderson, Las Vegas, North Las Vegas), NV2006 to 2011−60.2%+23.9%2021
San Joaquin County (Stockton), CA2006 to 2011−59.4%+9.0%2021
Nye County, NV2007 to 2012−59.1%+19.9%2021
St. Lucie County, FL2006 to 2012−57.4%+32.6%2021
Yuba County, CA2006 to 2011−56.1%+29.0%2021
Lee County, FL2006 to 2011−56.1%+36.8%2021
Solano County, CA2006 to 2012−56.0%+25.0%2021

Find your county

Search any of the 3,112 counties. Until you search, the table lists the 121 counties where PriceDNA covers a city, each linking to that market. The download has every county, with the after-inflation figures.

Counties with a PriceDNA market, and their hardest housing downturn on record, in dollars
CountyStateYearsPrices fellRent changeBack at peak
Anchorage Municipality (Anchorage)AK1984 to 1989−25.3%−13.6%1997
Fairbanks North Star Borough (Fairbanks)AK1984 to 1990−31.4%−19.6%1997
Madison County (Huntsville)AL2008 to 2014−6.8%+15.4%2018
Mobile County (Mobile)AL2008 to 2013−19.8%+21.3%2020
Pulaski County (Little Rock)AR2007 to 2011−3.4%+16.8%2016
Washington County (Fayetteville)AR2007 to 2011−19.2%+10.2%2017
Maricopa County (Chandler, Gilbert, Glendale, Mesa, Phoenix)AZ2006 to 2011−50.1%+21.6%2019
Pima County (Tucson)AZ2006 to 2012−37.9%+15.3%2021
Alameda County (Oakland)CA2006 to 2011−33.4%+12.5%2016
Fresno County (Fresno)CA2006 to 2012−48.2%+18.1%2021
Kern County (Bakersfield)CA2006 to 2011−51.2%+26.4%2022
Los Angeles County (Long Beach, Los Angeles)CA2006 to 2012−35.3%+21.7%2018
Orange County (Anaheim, Irvine, Santa Ana)CA2006 to 2011−32.6%+13.8%2018
Riverside County (Riverside)CA2006 to 2011−51.3%+25.6%2021
Sacramento County (Sacramento)CA2006 to 2011−49.4%+9.5%2020

Reading the numbers

What "typical" means here

Every county keeps its own row in our table, and the rankings are a plain sort. Only the headline figures need a choice: typical of what? Counting each county once describes the middle county. Counting each person once describes where the middle American lives. These differ a lot, because most US counties are small: half of all Americans live in just 145 of the 3,112.

Example 1: five real counties

We picked these five from the study because they show the difference clearly.

Five counties lined up from the smallest fall to the largest
CountyPrices fellPeople
Wichita County, KS−2.7%2,091
Bowman County, ND−3.2%2,906
Hinsdale County, CO−5.7%1,005
Los Angeles County, CA−35.3%9,808,667
Maricopa County, AZ−50.1%4,559,748

Counting counties

−5.7%

Pick the middle county of the five: Hinsdale. By this count, the middle fall was 5.7%.

But only 6,002 of these 14.4 million people live in the three counties that fell 5.7% or less.

Counting people

−35.3%

Line up all 14.4 million people by how far prices fell in their county, and find the person in the middle. That person lives in Los Angeles County.

Most of these people live where prices fell 35% or more. That is the view we report.

Across all 3,112 counties, the middle county fell 12.3%. The middle American's county fell 20.6%. Small counties tended to fall less: 11.2% for the middle county under 50,000 people, 21.4% for the middle county over 500,000.

Example 2: one rent area, counted many times

HUD sets one Fair Market Rent for each rent area, often a whole metro. Counties in the same area whose downturns ran the same years get the same rent change. In Atlanta's area, 17 counties fell from 2007 to 2012, so they share one rent change of +8.1%. Clayton and Henry counties, in the same area, started falling earlier and show +1.0% and +10.4%. Phoenix's rent area has two counties, Maricopa and Pinal, falling from 2006 to 2011, both +21.6%.

Two rent areas of similar size, counted two ways
Rent areaPeopleRent changeCounted by countyCounted by people
Atlanta, 17 counties5.2 million+8.1%17 votes5.2 million
Phoenix, 2 counties5.0 million+21.6%2 votes5.0 million

Counted by county, Atlanta's one rent would weigh about 8 times as much as Phoenix's, only because its area is cut into more counties. Counted by people, each resident counts once and the two weigh about the same. Across every county with a rent figure, the middle county's rent rose 11.2%; the middle American's rose 14.1%.

How we did it

Home prices
The FHFA House Price Index, yearly, for each county.
The downturn
Each county's hardest on record: the one that fell furthest behind the county's usual growth, adding up how far prices fell and how long they took to come back.
Rent
HUD's Fair Market Rent for a 2-bedroom home, as HUD published it, from the year prices peaked to the year they hit bottom.
Typical
The middle American, counting each county's people (US Census Bureau).
Inflation
Figures are in dollars. After inflation uses the Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index for all items.

County data of October 13, 2026.

Use the data

All 3,112 counties, in dollars and after inflation, free to reuse with a link to this page (CC BY 4.0).

Download the data

Cite this study

PriceDNA, “Home prices hit bottom. Rent held up. Each US county's hardest housing downturn,” October 2026. https://www.pricedna.co/research/county-downturns/

Full method and checks
Price index
FHFA's index follows the prices of the same homes each time they sell or are refinanced, so it measures how much prices changed, not what a home cost. A county uses its own index when its record starts by 2006, so it covers the housing crisis, and shows a downturn of at least 4 years. Otherwise it uses its metro area's index (37 counties) or its state's (462). These 499 counties are home to 2% of Americans; the largest is Allegheny County, Pennsylvania, which uses Pennsylvania's. FHFA publishes metro and state indexes by quarter; we average each year's four quarters.
Not in the study
32 counties in South Dakota: neither their own record, their metro's nor their state's shows a downturn lasting 4 years. Puerto Rico and the US territories are not included.
The downturn
A period when prices fell below an earlier peak and stayed below it for at least 4 years. Shorter dips are left out, because thin early data swings up and down within a year or two. A downturn still under way counts however short it is so far: for 60 counties, home to 0.2% of Americans, the hardest downturn began in 2021 or later and hasn't ended.
The hardest downturn
For each downturn we follow prices for 10 years from the peak and compare each year's price with where it would have been at the county's usual pace, its average yearly growth across its whole record. For this ranking, we assume prices grow at the usual pace once they are back at the peak, or from their latest level where the record ends sooner, so the years lost still count. Adding up the yearly gaps gives the downturn's shortfall, and the hardest downturn is the one with the largest. Example: in Will County, Illinois, prices fell 28.9% from 1980 to 1982 and were back by 1986. They fell 28.7% from 2007 to 2012 and weren't back until 2021. The second's shortfall was nearly twice as large, so it is Will County's hardest downturn, though the first fell slightly further. This is the same downturn the PriceDNA Report™ replays.
The fall
From the year prices peaked to the lowest year that followed.
Recovered
The first year prices were back at the peak, in dollars. The typical time is 12 years from the peak, or 6 from the bottom. Counting the 60 unfinished downturns as not yet recovered still gives 12.
Rent
HUD's estimate of the 40th percentile of rents paid, utilities included, by people who recently moved into a 2-bedroom home. It is a benchmark for a modest rental, not what every renter pays. HUD's fiscal year 2008 rent is paired with the 2008 price. HUD published no rents for 1984; we use the midpoint growth between 1983 and 1985.
How HUD builds rents
Each year's rent starts from Census survey rents collected over earlier years, which HUD moves forward with inflation in rents; today the newest survey year is 3 years before the rent year (HUD, 2026 method). HUD adopted a 2000 Census base in 2005, began using the Census Bureau's yearly survey to update rents in 2008 (HUD, 2008 notice), and moved to a five-year survey base in 2012 (HUD, 2012 notice). The Census survey check below compares HUD's rents with the rents people actually paid.
Rent against its usual pace
A county's yearly rent growth during its downturn, against its average yearly rent growth in all its other years from 1983. Earlier decades had higher inflation, so we also compare the two after inflation, using only years the Consumer Price Index covers.
Missing rent
153 counties, home to 5% of Americans, have no rent figure, because HUD's rent record for the county starts after its downturn began. Most started before 1983, when HUD's record begins, such as Harris County, Texas, whose hardest downturn began in 1982. The rest are Alaska areas whose HUD record starts later, after they were redrawn. The rent findings cover the other 2,959 counties.
Population
Each county's people, from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey 2020 to 2024 (table B01003). It shows where people live now, not where they lived during each downturn, and is used only to count people. Shares of all Americans count everyone in the 50 states and DC, including the counties left out of the study.
Inflation
The Bureau of Labor Statistics' Consumer Price Index for all items, US city average, yearly average (series CUUR0000SA0).

HUD's method changes

HUD documented changes to how it sets Fair Market Rents in 24 of the 45 years from 1983 to 2027, from rebuilding rents on new Census data to small changes in how it updates them. We use HUD's rents as published. Choosing which changes to correct would mean judging HUD's methods year by year, and correcting all 24 would replace most local rent data with a national average.

If, in the years of HUD's 9 major changes (new Census base data, the switch to the 40th percentile, and new metro areas), we replaced every county's rent change with the national change in rent from the Consumer Price Index, the typical rent change would be +17.6% instead of +14.1%, and 93.5% of Americans instead of 90.5% would live where rent ended higher. The main finding holds with either series. Replacing those years also removes real local movement, so the difference is not HUD's methods alone.

See the 24 years and HUD's notices
Years HUD documented a change to its Fair Market Rent method. ● marks the 9 major changes: new Census base data, the switch to the 40th percentile, and new metro areas.
YearWhat HUD changedSource
1983Moved the standard from the 50th to the 45th percentile of recent movers' rents (described in HUD's 1986 notice; we did not find the 1983 notice itself)HUD
1986 ●Rebuilt rents on the 1980 CensusHUD
1994 ●Rebuilt rents on the 1990 Census and adopted new metro areasHUD
1995 ●Moved the standard from the 45th to the 40th percentileHUD
1996Set a statewide minimum rent for low-rent rural areasHUD
2001Raised 39 metro areas to the 50th percentileHUD
2002Made a one-time adjustment for the natural gas price spikeHUD
2005 ●Rebuilt rents on the 2000 CensusHUD
2006 ●Adopted new metro areas, split some into separate rent areas, and brought back the state minimumHUD
2007Split more metros into separate rent areasHUD
2008Updated rents with the Census Bureau's new yearly survey for the first timeHUD
2009Changed how that survey's updates were applied in some areasHUD
2010Added 3-year survey data where yearly data was thinHUD
2012 ●Rebuilt rents on the Census Bureau's 5-year surveyHUD
2013Changed how rents are moved forward to the rent yearHUD
2014Changed Puerto Rico's data sourcesHUD
2016 ●Switched to a forecast to move rents forward, and adopted new metro areasHUD
2018Limited any yearly fall to 10%HUD
2020Used local and regional forecasts instead of one national one; ended the 50th percentile areasHUD
2022 ●Adopted new metro areasHUD
2023Added private-sector rent data to the yearly updateHUD
2024Counted recent movers as those who moved in the last 11 months, not 23HUD
2026 ●Adopted new metro areas; Connecticut moved to planning regionsHUD
2027Changed how utility costs are updatedHUD

We found a documented change in 24 years. For the other years we found no notice of a change, except 1985 and 1989 to 1993, whose notices survive only as scans we could not read, so a change in those years is possible. That window falls outside the housing crisis. If you know of a change we missed, tell us and we'll add it and rerun the study.

Does the result change under other choices?

We reran the rent findings with each choice a reasonable person could make differently. Among Americans with a rent figure, 95% to 99% live where rent ended higher in every row. The typical rent change runs from +12.1% to +17.6%, and how HUD's method changes are treated moves it the most.

The rent findings under other choices, in dollars. Each share counts people: everyone in the counties a row includes, or only those whose county has a rent figure.
ChoiceEveryone in the counties includedThose with a rent figureTypical rent change
As published90.5%95.2%+14.1%
HUD's 9 major change years replaced with the national rent change93.5%98.4%+17.6%
All 24 HUD change years replaced with the national rent change94.1%99.1%+12.1%
Deepest fall instead of hardest downturn87.7%95.1%+14.3%
Only counties with their own price index91.0%95.6%+14.4%
Only downturns that have ended90.5%95.2%+14.3%
Population from the 2010 Census90.4%95.0%+14.0%

"Replaced" means every county's rent change in those years is swapped for the national change in rent (Consumer Price Index for rent of primary residence, US city average).

"Deepest fall" picks earlier downturns in some counties, more of which began before HUD's rent record, so fewer Americans have a rent figure in that row.

A check with different data

The Census Bureau's yearly survey records the rent renters actually pay. It publishes yearly estimates for counties of 65,000 people or more, from 2005, except for 2020; counties whose downturn starts or ends in 2020 are left out. For the 637 of those counties whose downturn began in 2005 or later, home to 70% of Americans, rent was higher at the bottom for 97.0% of people, with a typical rise of 11.9%. HUD's rents give 96.1% for the same counties. The survey's rent is the middle rent of all renters, not only recent movers, so it moves more slowly than the rent a new tenant pays, but it does not carry HUD's survey lag. The agreement shows the finding does not rest on HUD's method.

Prices don't depend on these rent choices. The typical fall is 20.6% with today's population and 20.2% with the 2010 Census.

History, not a forecast: a past downturn does not say what a county will do next. PriceDNA is for education and information only. It is not an appraisal or investment advice.