California · 1110 census tracts

Los Angeles.

This Los Angeles housing market report covers about 1,551,000 homes across 1110 census tracts. It gives investors tract-level context on rent growth, home price growth, property tax and insurance cost assumptions, vacancy, and neighborhood variation. PriceDNA location scores range from 65 to 92, with a median of 78.8. Median household income is $79,903.

Approximate homes
1,551,000
across 1110 assigned tracts
Vacant homes
7.4%
of all homes
Renter-occupied
64%
of occupied homes
01.

Location score distribution

How location scores vary across 1110 census tracts in Los Angeles.

median 78.8 65 92

Half of Los Angeles's tracts score between 76 and 82. The full range spans 65 to 92, with a median of 78.8.

Distribution of tract scores
Median (78.8)
Mean (78.7)

What the location score shows

PriceDNA Location Score™ is a 0–100 signal designed to summarize local strength and risk context for rental-property analysis. Higher scores generally point to stronger location fundamentals.

The distribution matters because a city is rarely one market. The spread across Los Angeles's census tracts shows why investors should look below the city average before deciding where a property fits.

To see the location score for your specific property, analyze a property

02.

Housing composition

Key housing statistics for approximately 1,551,000 homes in Los Angeles, including occupancy, tenure, and structure type.

Tenure of occupied homes: owner 36%, renter 64%.
Tenure of occupied homes Owner 36% · Renter 64%
Housing occupancy: occupied 92.6%, vacant 7.4%.
Occupancy Occupied 92.6% · Vacant 7.4%

Of about 1,551,000 homes, 7.4% are vacant. Among occupied homes, 64% are renter-occupied, providing context on the size of the local rental base.

By structure type, about 42% of Los Angeles’s housing units are in single-family structures, 9% in small multifamily buildings (2–4 units), and 48% in larger multifamily buildings (5+ units). Percentages are rounded; small residual structure categories are not shown.

03.

How Los Angeles compares

City medians are useful, but investors need context. This table compares Los Angeles's local range with California and U.S. medians so you can quickly see where the market looks stronger, weaker, or more expensive than broader benchmarks.

Metric Los Angeles — lower · median · upper Los Angeles California CA United States US
Census ACS B19013 · 2020–2024
$61,002 $79,903 $104,358 $96,931 $77,173
College educated
Census ACS B15003 · 2020–2024
25% 41% 62% 42% 41%
Renter-age share (21–44)
Census ACS B01001 · 2020–2024
34% 37% 44% 34% 32%
FHFA HPI · 2025
4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 4.8% 5.2%
Census ACS B25064 · 2020–2024
4.4% 4.8% 5.3% 5.1% 4.4%
Property tax rate
Census ACS B25103 · 2020–2024
1.20% 1.20% 1.20% 1.20% 1.52%
Property insurance rate
Census ACS B25141 · 2020–2024
0.19% 0.19% 0.21% 0.21% 0.56%
Census ACS B25064 + B19013 · 2020–2024
33.2% 36.1% 39.3% 33.8% 30.8%
04.

About this data

PriceDNA uses the most local reliable data available for each metric. Some signals are available at the census-tract level. Others are published or more reliable at broader geographies such as county, metro, state, or national level.

Housing-unit totals are approximate. PriceDNA sums Census ACS counts for the tracts assigned to the city by centroid, so the market total can differ from a municipal boundary count when a tract crosses the city line.

The property-tax assumption combines local residential tax data with a state-level apartment benchmark to provide more conservative context for rental-property underwriting. Insurance assumptions use available residential property insurance data and should be verified for the specific property and coverage.

These pages are designed for market screening and investor education. They do not replace property-level underwriting, inspections, appraisals, insurance quotes, lender review, or professional advice.

You've seen the city. Now run a real address.

Market context is useful. The real decision happens at the property level.